Back From The Future Entanglement Signals? 5-23-12

On May 23, 2012, at 4:02 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:

So far it’s only the calculation

e.g.

for two distinct DISTINGUISHABLE Alice sender non-orthogonal coherent states entangled with an ordinary Bob qubit.

|Alice,Bob> = (1/2)[|Alice>|Bob1> + |Alice’>|Bob0>

S(Bob1) = S(Bob0) =  (1/2)(1 + |<Alice|Alice’>|^2)

S(Bob1) + S(Bob0)  = 1 + |<Alice|Alice’>|^2 > 1

Born’s probability rule VIOLATED for Glauber coherent states.

Of course, for the trapped ion system that will not be spacelike - but with delayed choice it may be RETRO-CAUSAL

For example, an ordinary crystal is a Glauber coherent state of VIRTUAL phonons of zero frequency and finite wave vectors inetger /lattice spacings.

Each phonon is a collective normal mode of all N atoms at the lattice points.

The lattice has P.W. Anderson’s “More is different” PHASE RIGIDITY it does not fall apart into a Poisson distribution at every gentle breeze. The Born probability interpretation breaks down!

On May 23, 2012, at 2:16 PM, nick herbert wrote:

Jack--

You have a specific FTL signaling proposal?
That's big news.
Where can I find it?

Nick


On May 23, 2012, at 11:16 AM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:


On May 23, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Kim Burrafato wrote:

http://iopscience.iop.org/1751-8121/45/23/232001

Nothing new. It does not address my entangled Glauber state proposal.