I disagree
When the events are complex and significant they are not statistical
New rules apply Vallee's high strangeness
When an alleged computer from the future tells me in 1953 of what will happen to me in 1973,which happens in fact and which is the cosmic trigger for the narrative in david kaisers MIT book etc that's a real time loop in a block universe in my opinion.
Remember CIA tape recording of my 1953 memory made in 1973 during SRI visit ties in with uri Geller narrative.
The rules of the game are more like a homicide police investigation rather than statistical analysis of unitary S matrix measurements.
More is different
Emergence of new rules with increasing complexity uniqueness of historical events.
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 7, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Ruth Kastner <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > wrote:
Yes to clarify I don't rule out that there could be legitimate pre-cognitive experiences. The question is what can be inferred from those. Having well-documented cases of correct predictions does not automatically imply that the future consists of actualized specific events.
From:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: RE: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUM
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:35:31 -0400
Yes Z, but Ruth doesn’t seem to have a problem with discussing the implications of precognition as a possibly real phenomenon. Like me she seems to be willing to discuss it, but not to go out on a limb and wholeheartedly agree with Jack. So, we were discussing whether precognition would definitely favor Jack’s theory, or whether it could be explained in her theory as well. She and I both seemed to make the point that viewing of future events doesn’t necessarily mean that someone is viewing the only possible future – there could be a number of possible futures.
Actually, on this point I remember reading some books by Lyall Watson back in the 1980s or early 1990s. Watson had various of these sorts of psychic precognition examples listed. I remember that he specifically claimed that aircraft, trains or other vehicles that are going to crash statistically have fewer people on them – that there is a rash of last-minute cancellations before the trip. I don’t know how rigorous his statistics were and whether this is really true. However, just assuming for a moment that it is, and that people do have an innate precognitive sense, what does Watson’s argument imply about the future?
As I remember Watson’s argument, he is not saying that people have a specific vision of dying in a fiery crash (although IIRC he claims that sometimes that does happen) but just that people get a bad feeling about the trip and come up with some excuse to cancel and do something else. The precognition in his argument therefore happens at a sort of half-conscious level.
Either the people who last minute cancel are never going to die/are not “supposed” to die (whatever that means; maybe Jack’s future cosmological horizon quantum computer is post-determining that they live longer), and the precognition happens in order to actualize the future that is there all along. Or, the cancellations are simply weird effects at a classical level, kind of like a Novikov self-consistency principle that would cause odd coincidences to happen to prevent you from changing history if you travelled to the past through a wormhole.
Alternatively, a future existed in which those people did die, and they precognitively sensed it, and so actualized a different future where they avoided death. This would mean that the future is changeable through precognition, so multiple possible futures must exist.
From: Paul Zielinski [
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ]
Sent: April-07-14 9:08 PM
To: Robert Addinall
Subject: Re: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUM
Except that we were also talking about Ruth Kastner's alternative model for "retro-causality". Which
doesn't agree with Jack's.
Remember?
On 4/7/2014 5:39 PM, Robert Addinall wrote:
Anyway, this is exactly what I was saying the other day – for the purposes of this conversation accepting Jack’s concept of precognition as a proven reality is fine.
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Ruth Kastner wrote:Yes to clarify I don't rule out that there could be legitimate pre-cognitive experiences. The question is what can be inferred from those. Havingwell-documented cases of correct predictions does not automatically imply that the future consists of actualized specific events._____________________________________________________________On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:18 PM, JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > wrote:Every really wealthy person I know well personally has an uncanny talent to make good decisions financially.I am not talking only about stock market.For example, the Marshall Naify had extraordinary powers akin to Uri Geller’s and Ingo Swann. I personally experienced “mental time travel” with him (shared telepathic experience) to past events (Ancient Egypt, Middle Ages). He saw the potential of cable TV early and was one of the creators of what led to Comcast.I have also noticed other evidence in them of paranormal talent.I am not saying this as a scientific fact - only a subjective observation - folklore.I am not saying that 100% of the 1% are precognitive but that a significant fraction are.Even successful criminals and evil leaders are.On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:59 PM,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. wrote:Question, for Jack, et al...Is it possible... or have you considered (seriously, with respect)... that what's in play here is a form of human perception perhaps located somewhere on the autism spectrum, even higher-functioning than Asperger's?I am not a brain neuroscientist. I do not know.If such a condition were to allow "tuning" to different signals from what "typical" receivers (people, brains) are capable of picking up. Not to imply "disability" or abnormality, per se, but a "stretch" in what most people are able to perceive... or perceive and retain in consciousness. Also, Jack's signal had to have a 'sender,' who quite likely would know about the "tuning" aspect of human perception, in the 1950s quite new to us.Exactly my point! HIGH STRANGENESS - REALITY OF THE UNCANNY THAT MANY STRAIGHT SCIENTISTS OUT OF FEAR SUPPRESS.Vallee and Davis Physics of High Strangeness ... - skinwalker ranchwww.skinwalkerranch.org/images/Vallee-Davis-model.pdfby JF Vallee - Cited by 6 - Related articlesOct 24, 2003 - clarify the issues surrounding “high strangeness” observations by ... Jacques Vallée has a Ph.D. in computer science; Eric Davis holds a Ph.D.You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 3/1/14High Strangeness by Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Arkadiusz Jadczykwww.cassiopaea.org/cass/high_strangeness.htmThe term "high strangeness" is attributed to Dr. J. Allen Hynek who addressed the ... French scientist, Jacques Vallee writes in a paper about High Strangeness:.High strangeness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_strangenessWikipediaWithin the domain of Ufology, high-strangeness is a term used to denote a ... It is perhaps of interest that Jacques Vallee, a close colleague of Hynek, has in a ...This doesn't explain "contacts" by some kind of external source using conventional physical means (i.e., the telephone); could these have been an effort to "simulate extraordinary stimulation" by scientists studying such phenomena. I.e., if selected for programming, how to reach Jack (others?) without alarming them?Well, the phone calls were real. Who made them is still a mystery.Conversely, "extraordinary" ET or UT entities intending to contact and influence (this young scientist, retrocausally identified from the future) could have used the telephone because "supernatural" modalities of such "contact" might have triggered a psychotic break or other rejection reaction, by Jack's mother or any subsequently engaged psychiatrists brought in to "help" normalize their target, getting him locked away or chemically restrained, as quite obviously has happened to many other such "revelatees" over millennia?That did not happen to me. But remember I was part of the USG superkids project out of Columbia University AFTER the phone calls throughout high-school with early admission into Ivy League Cornell with full scholarship for four years.This project (also associated with Ayn Rand) was funded by born in Brooklyn (where I lived):The Eugene McDermott Scholars Program - The University of Texas ...www.utdallas.edu/mcdermott/University of Texas at DallasFeb 25, 2014 - Established by Mrs. Eugene McDermott in support of her husband's dream, the McDermott Scholars program provides select UT Dallas ...Application Information - The McDermott Award - Meet the Scholars - Contact UsEugene McDermott Library - The University of Texas at Dallaswww.utdallas.edu/library/University of Texas at DallasOnline catalog, list of newly acquired titles, and general information for the lecture series and the McDermott and Callier Libraries.Databases - Library Hours - Journals - eBooks CollectionsEugene McDermott - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_McDermottWikipediaEugene McDermott (1899-1973) was a geophysicist and co-founder first of Geophysical Service and later of Texas Instruments. Born in Brooklyn, New York, on ...Early career - Geophysical Service - Texas Instruments - PhilanthropyYou've visited this page 4 times. Last visit: 11/25/13"IT" used the phone because that approach would not necessarily provoke a panicked response the way a "Biblical" manifestion of revelatory experience likely would have, i.e., "messianic" distortion or psychic break.Either way, the net effect was to recontextualize Jack's personality and "genius," providing direction (both overt and subliminally, likely) and opening his mind to a stream of ongoing but more subtle signals later on.Credulity, post-exposure, would be interesting to some scientists contemporaneous to the experience?http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/cacheof-summary-paper-the-invasion-from-mars-readings-in-social-psychology-1947-hadley-cantril.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadley_CantrilOn Apr 9, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Paul Zielinski <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > wrote:So Jack is not going to be satisfied with retro-causal connections between mere possibilities.For him the future is fully actualized and physically influences the present through CTCs in aneternal block universe.For him, that is what "precognition" means.On 4/9/2014 11:51 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:I disagreeWhen the events are complex and significant they are not statisticalNew rules apply Vallee's high strangenessWhen an alleged computer from the future tells me in 1953 of what will happen to me in 1973,which happens in fact and which is the cosmic trigger for the narrative in david kaisers MIT book etc that's a real time loop in a block universe in my opinion.Remember CIA tape recording of my 1953 memory made in 1973 during SRI visit ties in with uri Geller narrative.The rules of the game are more like a homicide police investigation rather than statistical analysis of unitary S matrix measurements.More is differentEmergence of new rules with increasing complexity uniqueness of historical events.Sent from my iPadOn Apr 7, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Ruth Kastner <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > wrote:Yes to clarify I don't rule out that there could be legitimate pre-cognitive experiences. The question is what can be inferred from those. Having well-documented cases of correct predictions does not automatically imply that the future consists of actualized specific events.From:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. To:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Subject: RE: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUMDate: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:35:31 -0400Yes Z, but Ruth doesn’t seem to have a problem with discussing the implications of precognition as a possibly real phenomenon. Like me she seems to be willing to discuss it, but not to go out on a limb and wholeheartedly agree with Jack. So, we were discussing whether precognition would definitely favor Jack’s theory, or whether it could be explained in her theory as well. She and I both seemed to make the point that viewing of future events doesn’t necessarily mean that someone is viewing the only possible future – there could be a number of possible futures.Actually, on this point I remember reading some books by Lyall Watson back in the 1980s or early 1990s. Watson had various of these sorts of psychic precognition examples listed. I remember that he specifically claimed that aircraft, trains or other vehicles that are going to crash statistically have fewer people on them – that there is a rash of last-minute cancellations before the trip. I don’t know how rigorous his statistics were and whether this is really true. However, just assuming for a moment that it is, and that people do have an innate precognitive sense, what does Watson’s argument imply about the future?As I remember Watson’s argument, he is not saying that people have a specific vision of dying in a fiery crash (although IIRC he claims that sometimes that does happen) but just that people get a bad feeling about the trip and come up with some excuse to cancel and do something else. The precognition in his argument therefore happens at a sort of half-conscious level.Either the people who last minute cancel are never going to die/are not “supposed” to die (whatever that means; maybe Jack’s future cosmological horizon quantum computer is post-determining that they live longer), and the precognition happens in order to actualize the future that is there all along. Or, the cancellations are simply weird effects at a classical level, kind of like a Novikov self-consistency principle that would cause odd coincidences to happen to prevent you from changing history if you travelled to the past through a wormhole.Alternatively, a future existed in which those people did die, and they precognitively sensed it, and so actualized a different future where they avoided death. This would mean that the future is changeable through precognition, so multiple possible futures must exist.From: Paul Zielinski [mailto:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ]Sent: April-07-14 9:08 PMTo: Robert AddinallSubject: Re: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUMExcept that we were also talking about Ruth Kastner's alternative model for "retro-causality". Whichdoesn't agree with Jack's.Remember?On 4/7/2014 5:39 PM, Robert Addinall wrote:Anyway, this is exactly what I was saying the other day – for the purposes of this conversation accepting Jack’s concept of precognition as a proven reality is fine.